Community Engagement

Notes on a IE Action Project

Notes from December 14, 2007 work session

Filed under: Project Discussion — by Gary Kruchowski at 10:18 pm on Friday, December 28, 2007

Submitted by Mark Winson

Attendance: Gary K., Steve W., Janet B., Pam E., Peggy G., Kevin F., Mark W., Wade G., Bill M., Sonda S-L.

Define ‘Event’

invite persons from the outside (open to the public)
anything that brings the community on to the campus
***Anytime the public comes to the campus for an activity is an event
Event/activities that involve public areas (not classroom/lab)

SWOT analysis
Strengths

  • Have great facilities
  • Great maintenance staff
  • Plenty of parking
  • Great location
  • Staff creatively generates the opportunity for events

Weaknesses

  • No protocol/procedure for events
  • Ideas are generated throughout the campus (lack of central processing)
  • People do not know what is available here (facilities, etc.)
  • Don’t have a consistent fee structure for charging
  • Have not clarified which senior administrator is in charge
  • R25 is not well understood and/or utilized well by staff
  • Don’t have an updated directory (map) of rooms and locations

Opportunities

  • Ideas are generated throughout the campus (lots of ideas for events)
  • We have established events that could generate other events
  • We have an established program for scheduling (R25)
  • We can generate some revenue through events
  • Events generate greater publicity for institution

Threats

  • Competition with other venues
  • Perception that the campus is favoring some political or religious viewpoint
  • Liability issues
  • Inconsistent application of policy

Current State

  • Communication – use of R25 and its capabilities (invite Shannon to next meeting)
  • Need to develop a check list for event planning
  • Discussion on types of events to try to attract to campus
  • Not in competition with other venues

Events should be…

  • Tied to LSC mission
  • Student driven
  • Cultural
  • Public service

To do list:

  • Need to research state policy on using state resources for “for profit” organizations
  • Research other college policies
  • Provide committee members with copies of current policy and application forms
  • This committee does not have a faculty representative, so it is important to solicit faculty input on this project

Notes from November 30, 2007 work session

Filed under: Project Discussion — by Gary Kruchowski at 9:54 pm on Friday, December 28, 2007

Submitted by Mark Winson

Attendance: Gary K., Steve W., Janet B., Pam E., Peggy G., Kevin F., Tess D., Mark W.

Changes in membership: Lin Black has gone to a different project, Zbigniew Wdowiak has left I. E. due to class scheduling conflicts, Tess D’ Andrea and Mark Winson have joined the project.

Discussion of goal(s) for this action project:

What is the problem?

  • More then one event is occurring at the same time
  • How well are events meeting the goals of having the event
  • We want the community to know more about the college per the Conversation Day discussion.

Issues

  • Internal coordination – no one knows what events are taking place or planned
  • External coordination – our events are held at the same time as other events in the community
  • Evaluation – there is none, don’t know how many people attend, what are the demographics
  • Internal communication for logistics
    • Maintenance
    • Publicity
    • Impact on the community
    • No recognized source for event calendar
    • Academics scheduling of classes
    • Location of event information
  • R25 is not appropriately deployed
  • Should develop a checklist
    • add questions intended audience, hoped for outcomes
  • Need to develop system to approve events
  • Are we missing opportunities for collaboration

GOAL

Create a system (procedures and policies) to improve quality of campus events/activities and maximize the impact on the community.

Should include all facilities including ERTC and airport

Need to create a definition for “event”

Future/desired state

  • Event Planning
    • Public Information needs to be in the loop so that everyone can know about all events on a timely basis
    • Spread events out over the year
    • Do events that serve the community
    • Event application/approval process to be clear and effective
    • Events system needs to work with Academic schedule
    • Events implementation and promotion
    • Communication to ancillary services maintenance, food service, public information
    • Consistent promotion policy
    • One stop resource
    • Coordination with other events in the community
  • Events assessment and evaluation
    • measure participant satisfaction
    • demographic breakout
    • participation numbers
    • measure cost/benefit financially
    • assess missed opportunities
    • Data analysis